Search for: "Russell, Appeal of"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 9:33 am
Plaintiffs direct the Court’s attention to the district court decision in Russell v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
(Because both of the District Court rulings were by three-judge courts, appeals from those decisions went directly to the Supreme Court.) [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
It will never stand on appeal. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 1:50 pm
Adam Aliano and Russell Spivak explored the early history of military foraging and the relevant legal concepts used by Gen. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:06 am
Okay, look, I may just be a simple country law-yer, but that sounds to me like some Russell’s-teapot reasoning. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
See Russell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
The statute creates a new entity in the PTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, to rule on those challenges. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
In a split decision authored by Judge Dennis Deters, joined by Judge Russell Mock, the First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision to convict Buttery. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Occlutech (Kluwer Patent Blog) Greece Court of Appeal Thessaloniki: Patent covering ornamental light device lacks novelty and inventive step: Palaiochorinos S.A. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
ICO Facebook has announced its intention to appeal the ICO’s £500,000 fine in relation to the misuse of personal data harvested by Cambridge Analytica. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among counsel to the petitioner in MCM. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell was among the counsel for the respondents in the case.] [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
At oral argument, Thomas Hungar of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP argued for Slack; Kevin Russell of Goldstein, Russell & Woofter LLC argued for Pirani. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:34 pm
R33 – appeals from Registrar decisions to be sent to an administrative tribunal constituted for this purpose, or already in existence. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
The court of appeals there joined three others in holding that a provision in the REAL ID Act of 2005, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:15 pm
Thus, '[t]he corporation [is] the real party plaintiff in the action.' Russell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represents the respondent.) [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
In both cases, substantial resources were consumed by the Supreme Court on appeals that ended up being unnecessary. [read post]
