Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
Barzilay, Judge) SUMMARY: The action filed by Plaintiffs Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance et. al. against Defendant United States appears anew before the court on remand from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
18 May 2009, 6:54 pm
Agpaoa et. al., Civ. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
Halifax PLC, et al. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Patterson, et al. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:07 am
The Court has granted certiorari in 4 cases: Hemi Group, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:11 pm
In Safeco Insurance Company of America, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
Consumerbargaingiveaways, LLC, et al., N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
Gap, Inc., et al., No. 07-5739 SC (N.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
Gap, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-5739 SC, holding that Ruiz's allegations of an increased risk of identity theft "do[] not rise to the level of appreciable harm necessary to assert a negligence claim under California law. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
Yes, word is that the first major band to use file-sharing as a business model1 has agreed to step up on behalf of the defense in the whole Sony (et al) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
Comstock, et al., 08-1224). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation, Oppositions Nos. 91161403, 91161405, et al. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:09 pm
American International Processing, L.L.C., et al, (Del. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Riegel et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
Indeed, on February 4, 2009, the self-described “progressive” Constitutional Accountability Center filed a brief in the consolidated case of McDonald, et al., and National Rifle Association of America, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
The Wilderness Society, et al. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:21 am
"
Dragon et al. v. [read post]
