Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
As an initial matter, the Court of Appeal explained that under People ex rel. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 7:41 am
State ex rel. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 3:22 am
"State ex rel. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeProposed Claim Untimely Under State False Claims Law's Limits Period, Would Not Relate Back to 2000United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:27 am
Ex Rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
Hoppe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Wisconsin ex rel. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
A9806B
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the public protection and general government budget for the 2008-2009 state fiscal plan No Same as Last Act: 03/09/08 amend and recommit to ways and means03/09/08 print number 9806bA9808B
Budget -- Enacts major components of legislation necessary to implement the health and mental hygiene budget for the 2008-2009 fiscal year No Same as Last Act: 03/09/08 amend… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 26, 2008 State of Oklahoma ex rel. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
There was a potentially significant decision on February 19th in the Georgia Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
The Court of Appeal concluded that punitive damages in the amount of $100,000 were appropriate. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:51 pm
" Mordenti v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:29 am
People ex. rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Weber ex rel Estate of Ruble v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
Industrial Commission Rejects Affidavit Testimony Posted on February 6, 2008 by Patrick Lewis The Ohio Supreme Court recently decided State ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
Industrial Commission Rejects Affidavit Testimony Posted on February 6, 2008 by Patrick Lewis The Ohio Supreme Court recently decided State ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:37 am
… Furthermore, nothing in our six-factor test adopted in [State ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
That’s exactly what those statutes mean, at least the specific sections of the Government Claims Act at issue in People ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
The High Court has agreed to review U.S. ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeEnglish Language Deficiency May Toll AEDPA Limit But Due Diligence Warranting Tolling Not ShownDiaz v. [read post]
