Search for: "STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 5,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 6:58 am
Board of Education Supreme Court's 1983 decision in Connick v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
Board of Education only began to be realized on a wide scale after Congress passed Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which together effectively tied federal funding of public schools to desegregation efforts. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
This Board’s report resulted in no settlement. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:17 am
Stein argued that omission meant that the hearing officer did not have jurisdiction to hear testimony in the matter.According to case law, “in the absence of a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other person to conduct the hearing, the removing board or officer has no jurisdiction to discipline an employee” (Wiggins v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 60 NY2d 385). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am
Stating the reasons why protection is necessary. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
This is so even where that party disagrees with the particular findings, rationale or the opinion supporting the judgment or order below in his favor, or where he failed to prevail on all the issues that had been raised" (Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545 [1983] [internal citations omitted]).This, of course, is what's known as the sore winner rule of appellate practice. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
" Despite this assurance, Ruggiero submitted her resignation.The Appellate Division held that there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that Ruggiero voluntarily left her employment without good cause.Another aspect of unemployment insurance claims: a claim for benefits filed by an educator who is unemployed between school semesters. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
§2111 of the Education Law is an example of a situation where "acceptance of the resignation" is mandated by statute. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
§2111 of the Education Law is an example of a situation where "acceptance of the resignation" is mandated by statute. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 4:12 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:35 am
The guidelines also state no parent can be required to pay more than 50% of the cost of an undergraduate degree (tuition, fees, and room and board) for an in-state resident at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:33 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
we received significant comment stating that election contests are distracting and time-consuming for companies, boards, and management. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
[Watertown Educ. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:57 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
[Watertown Educ. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
