Search for: "SUMMERS v. POWERS" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2008, 3:23 pm
On Monday night, Delaware Vice Chancellor Lamb issued an opinion in the epic Hexion v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
  Jon is a 3L at the University of Richmond School of Law and a 2008 Akin Gump summer associate. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
The Court is in recess for the summer. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:26 am
A number of entities have continued to weigh in as amici in the Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
(The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, for example, was ruled in part unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
CITY OF CRESSON, No. 08-0143 IN RE SCOTT ASHTON, DPM., AND ASHTON PODIATRY ASSOCIATES, P.A., No. 08-0183 TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY, FIRST CHOICE POWER, INC., AND TEXAS GENERATING CO., L.P. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:21 am
Despite indications that the holding would be the opposite, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals delivered an opinion in Free Enterprise v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
The Court is in recess for the summer. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
Below, Jonathan Ross previews next term’s Summers v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Louisiana, established a prohibition against state laws that would subject anyone but murderers to the death penalty, a welcome result that halted the expansion of a barbaric exercise of the state's ultimate power. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:04 pm
The Supreme Court, issuing its first round of summer orders, took no action  on Monday on a request to  reconsider its ruling in Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:41 pm
None other than high-powered partner Gandolfo V. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 1:45 pm
" Justice Scalia, writing for a four-member majority, vacated the Ninth Circuit's decisions in Morgan-Stanley and its companion case, American Electric Power Service Corp. v. [read post]