Search for: "Smith v. Smith"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 14,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 3:25 am
Oct. 8, 2014), the Court of Appeals relied on the recent Tennessee Supreme Court decision of Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
Which is not just a "Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm
” “A spokeswoman for Foley wrote in an email that the firm declines comment on the allegations in Schumann/Steier Holdings v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm
Failure to do so is unconstitutional and requires reversal of the conviction (id.).Five days ago, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that the rule of law announced in Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, __ NYS3d __, 2015 NY Slip Op 07565 [Oct. 15, 2015]). [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:22 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:18 pm
Noonan -- As the dodo of patent practice, the number of interferences has been steadily dwindling since enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2012 abolished the practice in favor of a "first inventor to file" regime and a derivation proceeding for instances where a patentee is found to have taken the invention from the true inventor (35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am
Bethune-Hill; and a reviewability of agency decision case, Smith v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm
Board of Education and Bolling v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:01 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals considered several issues with respect to cash-assistance benefits under the Family Independence Program (FIP) in the consolidated appeals of Smith v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:20 pm
Wei v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
July 25, 2008): [*P37] The trial court overruled Smith's motion upon the authority of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:13 am
Hence, no ineffective assistance occurred.In Smith v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
Judge Milan Smith authors a smart opinion today about when (if ever) you have to remand a putative class action case that was removed under CAFA once you find out that Article III standing is absent over the named plaintiff. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Robbin Smith et al. v. [read post]
