Search for: "State v Locke" Results 1921 - 1940 of 3,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2021, 8:56 am by Corene Kendrick
Last week, a state court judge in Orange County, California, declared the end of a landmark lawsuit called Campbell v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 3:55 pm by Larry
In reality, the language is taken from In Zone Brands v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:20 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The true scope of the elusive but all pervasive party autonomy doctrine was at the heart of the debate in the case of Rock Advertising Limited v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:40 pm by Matthew D. Kaplan
” Because prisoners represent a population with which many people have little sympathy, it is important to note here that cities, states and the federal government have a legal obligation to care for the people they lock up. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 3:35 am
The Supreme Court approved that practice in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:10 am by Steven Siegler
The law was passed in in the midst of the Great Depression, when unions and management were "locked in battle over issues ranging from employee demands for sustainable wages to improved working conditions," said Justice Barry Albin, in the 6-1 majority decision in Lourdes Medical Center of Burlington County v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
For the first time, anyone can search and read all California court opinions for free, including landmark rulings on every topic, from same-sex marriage (In re Marriage Cases, 2008) to separation of powers (Houston v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:15 pm by Daniel Low
The unions selectively picketed the grocery chains, and the stores responded by locking out their union employees and exchanging approximately $146 million under the profit-sharing agreement.The State of California filed suit against the defendants, and moved for a summary judgment ruling that the profit sharing agreement violated § 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
The two amendments would have amended the Florida constitution to authorize school vouchers, to remove its “no aid” to religious institutions provision from the declaration of rights, and to write the dissent in Locke v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:07 am
Two: they want to maintain the litigation while seeking to lock plaintiffs into a fixed figure before discovery is completed. [read post]