Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 1921 - 1940 of 13,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Josh Blackman
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Krzysztof Pacula
This interpretation is of course in line with the pre-existing case-law, in particular the judgments in Cases C-340/16, MMA IARD, paragraph 34 and C-106/17, Hofsoe, paragraph 45. [read post]
Another Year, Another Attempt in Congress to Ban Non-Competes Nationwide Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) introduced legislation in 2019 entitled the Workforce Mobility Act (“WMA”). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:10 am by Jon Sands
  The 9th holds, in essence, that Fed R Civ Pro 10(c) is satisfied when a pro se petitioner sets out specific grounds for relief in an attached court decision. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:38 am by Cristina Mariottini
Trattamento Rifiuti Metropolitani (Lis Pendens and Conflicting Choice of Court Agreements in BNP Paribas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
When it comes to the validity of European patents, the national courts of the EPC member states apply the same law as the EPO. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:09 am by Thalia Kruger
In the case of C. and E. v France, the French Court of Cassation asked the ECtHR for an advisory opinion on the question whether the current state of the case law in France was compatible with the obligations under Article 8 ECHR (the right to respect for private and family life). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7- 8 October 2019. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Giles Peaker
But then came Spencer v Taylor (2013) EWCA Civ 1600. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Giles Peaker
But then came Spencer v Taylor (2013) EWCA Civ 1600. [read post]