Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 37,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 8:02 am
Wolf) that legalized same-sex marriages in the state. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:51 am
Viacom Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
” In the case, Mansifield v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 5:06 am
Trying to keep the case in State or County Court is most favorable for the homeowner. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
In Nigg v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
” In the case, Mansifield v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm
On March 2, 2011, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of Allstate Insurance Company based upon a Complaint for declaratory relief in the case of Allstate v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 11:35 pm
Stevens v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
Department of the Interior v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:42 am
In 2009, I filed an amicus brief (Senn v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
Of the criminal cases, just three decisions reversed state courts that ruled in favor of criminal defendants: Maryland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Based on the allegations set forth in the Amended Complaint, viewed in Plaintiffs' favor, no reasonable official would have believed that his or her conduct was authorized by state or constitutional law. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:14 pm
Coyne v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
Furthermore, the court concluded that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate a compelling reason to curtail MoveOn.org's political speech in favor of protecting of the State's service mark. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
