Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1921 - 1940 of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
Continuing our coverage of the invitation briefs filed by the United States in the past few weeks, the Solicitor General’s office has filed briefs recommending that certiorari be denied in the following cases: No. 08-448, CNN v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:34 am by Fong & Aquino
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court recently decided United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:34 am by Fong & Aquino
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
On 25 June 2021 Meade J handed down his decision in the second of a series of trials listed as part of the Optis v Apple UK action ([2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat); a link the judgment is here). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Apple necessarily failed to allege a concerted action between Samsung and ETSI necessary to state a claim under Section 1, the court held.The decision in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Cory J. Fox
  H.B. 232 does not apply to any person or entity subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, any person or entity subject to HIPAA, or any Kentucky agencies, local governments, or political subdivisions. [read post]