Search for: "State v. Irons" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2017, 5:26 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
This principle was stated quite clearly in 2008 by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 5:26 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
This principle was stated quite clearly in 2008 by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
He said "ironically, if you had not followed the precedent, some would attack you for being an activist. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
Ironically, the opinion in this case informs us there was a better path and no one followed it. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:48 am by SHG
But the First Circuit previously held in a 2018 case with the same name, Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the contexts litigating American religion, sincerity seem to be equated with depth and intensity of personal feeling, rather than coherence of intellectual and moral judgment.In some ways, this equation of sincerity with honest and deep emotional commitment is understandable, given the dominance of Evangelical Protestantism in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The problem for the states in these cases is that if their only reason to ban same-sex marriage is religious, the bans are unconstitutional under Lemon v. [read post]