Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
The House of Lords report from the Select Committee on Communications entitled “UK advertising in a digital age” provides useful context. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
Lord Sumption expressly rejec [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Telegraph reports, details of Lord Mandelson’s visit to a Siberian steam ‘banya‘ were disclosed during Rothschild v Associated Newspapers, heard last week by Tugendhat J, without a jury. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:58 am
On 7 February 2025, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) heard argument over the release to the media of documents from the case of H6 v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/205/2023). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Elias both gave concurring judgments. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:01 am
In the UK House of Lords decision of Blathwayt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
He must not consciously mis-state the facts. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Panetta (Al-Awlaki v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In Kilby et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court has this paradigm case pending before it (Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Lady Justice Smith stated that it was possible in principle for an estoppel by res judicata to be created by a Tomlin Order, although it would often be more difficult to determine precisely what issues had been compromised, as the terms of a Tomlin Order would not be made public. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
The rule of law objection to vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned:"Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Isn't it wrong for me to change my opinion simply because one of the victims stiffed a drug lord? [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
As Lord Reid explained in that case, at p 1033, Julius v Bishop of Oxford 5 App Cas 214 is itself authority for going behind the words which confer a statutory power to the general scope and objects of the Act in order to find what was intended. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:42 pm
"Praise the Lord! [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
