Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm
Utah State Charter School Board (10th Cir., December 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Board because its members were entitled to qualified immunity)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jackson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:42 pm
Moniz (10th Cir., December 6, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Moniz on Dye's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims because the undisputed evidence showed that Dye chose to retire)Labor Unions*United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:43 pm
Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
In addition, even though the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of likelihood of confusion, it also concluded that the district court erred in adopting a rule excluding any consideration of a senior user’s post-infringement use of the mark and erred in certain aspects of its analysis, including how the court weighed strength of the mark and Bacardi’s intent (Lodestar Anstalt v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
A spokesperson for LVMH welcomed the move, stating that French ruling protects consumers from becoming a victim due to the “illicit use of trade marks”. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:17 am
See Salacuse v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 2:44 am
Aachi Spices & Foods v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:53 am
KG v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:30 pm
Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway is reviewing the state's 38 death row cases, including the two that initiated the Supreme Court challenge in Baze v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
” These “Marks” included “all ‘Camellia Grill’ marks on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office” and “all ‘trade dress’ associated with the ‘Camellia Grill’ Restaurant,” as well as blueprints, menus, and recipes. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 6:06 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:14 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
The expected outcome in the case, considering United States v Windsor, is that the Commonwealth's ban will be declared unconstitutional.In announcing the policy reversal, AG Herring applauded the litigants even though as a state legislator, he voted for the ban. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:31 am
Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Id. at 90 (discussing State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm
” 492 U.S., at 51 (internal quotation marks omitted); see, e.g., Stern, 564 U.S., at 489–490; Oil States, 584 U.S., at 345. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
Even though the words of Article 13 are not expressly reflected in the English Trade Marks Act, the UK’s registrar of Trade Mark, whose task is to implement Article 13 on behalf of the State in Registry proceedings in the UK, must give effect to the binding provisions of Article 13. [read post]
