Search for: "State v. Michael" Results 1921 - 1940 of 12,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance Arkansas: “Arkansas Hires Connecticut Company to Build Campaign Finance Filing, Reporting System” by Michael Wickline for Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Maine: “Group Using Fake Name to Survey Mainers on Culture War Issues” by Randy Billings (Portland Press Herald) for Yahoo News Montana: “Commissioner Finds Bozeman Law Firm Failed to Register as Political Committee” by Tom Kuglin for Helena Independent Record Elections National:… [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
Joseph Murr, Michael Murr, Donna Murr and Peggy Heaver (collectively, the Murrs) appealed a judgment dismissing their regulatory takings claim upon motions for summary judgment by the State of Wisconsin and St. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
Joseph Murr, Michael Murr, Donna Murr and Peggy Heaver (collectively, the Murrs) appealed a judgment dismissing their regulatory takings claim upon motions for summary judgment by the State of Wisconsin and St. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:21 pm
The Supreme Court's new opinion KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:16 am
In its decision Monday in the antirtust case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Smith, and others; Halbrook on the Court’s decision to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:42 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Michael Greve's The Upside Down Constitution (Harvard University Press 2012).Sandy LevinsonMichael Greve has written a remarkable book that should be read by anyone interested in federalism.He also offers an interesting--and quite persuasive--defense of Swift v. [read post]