Search for: "State v. Prime"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
” State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
” State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
The Court was bound by the Supreme Court in LB Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 to the effect that section 89(1) could not read down under section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“the HRA 1998″) so as to provide a longer period of postponement than six weeks in a case where that would otherwise be required to give effect to the Article 8 right of an occupier. 6 weeks had expired since the possession order. v) “assuming that it is for [Circle 33] to… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
”) Sections 12598 through 12599.7; Holt v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
The Newtown Township Board of Supervisors enacted a Planned Residential Development Ordinance (“PRD Ordinance”) pursuant to state statute. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
The Newtown Township Board of Supervisors enacted a Planned Residential Development Ordinance (“PRD Ordinance”) pursuant to state statute. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
A prime example of an inherently dangerous activity is a demolition of a structure. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:11 am
See the original state court complaint. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
(For a prior post on that case, see “First District Publishes Significant CEQA Decision On Legal Feasibility Of Mitigation For Prime Farmland Losses In Masonite Corporation v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:20 am
Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC v Town of Durham, 18 F. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:20 am
Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC v Town of Durham, 18 F. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases.RecommendationThe IMHLA recommends that the Bill should state that if a person is being admitted to any residential centre, this can only occur on a voluntary basis, where the person has capacity to consent to such admission and does consent to such admission. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:17 am
Wells Bennett linked us to video of yesterday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
State of Missouri v Board of Adjustment of City of Branson, 2014 WL 6478610 (MO App. 11/19/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp? [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
State of Missouri v Board of Adjustment of City of Branson, 2014 WL 6478610 (MO App. 11/19/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp? [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
He claims that U.S. training made the difference in a battle against the Islamic State. [read post]
