Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 11,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Both state and federal courts in New York favor deciding cases on the merits. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:54 pm
I have only skimmed Maryland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:13 am
This saves taxpayers money. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm
A trademark owner can save time, expense, and effort by adopting an inherently distinctive mark and ensuring it is registered on the Principal Register with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
The recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Pan American Grain Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
Any day now, the Court could decide California v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
You could save millions of dollars in litigation costs and sanction avoidance. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:32 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
Gifford v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:07 am
Now that the uncertainty has been removed, there should be significant cost savings. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
July 21, 1998); United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:41 am
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
By Shira Zucker This August, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled in SEC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 pm
If you'd have asked me in 2014 if the ultimate vote on Prop. 49 would have been 6-1 to uphold the thing, I'd save said "No way. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:45 pm
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:09 am
LP v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:09 am
LP v. [read post]
