Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2021, 5:49 pm
” “As early as Schnell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 11:04 pm
Board of Education? [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
In mid-March, the Court granted certiorari in Negusie v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Second, Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
For inaction on that risk to constitute bad faith, the court stated, the plaintiff would have to plead more that he did.Waste. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
” At the ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma looks at Turner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
Board of Education that overturned the notion that discrimination was okay as long as minorities were provided “separate but equal” opportunities. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:07 am
The decision is Exby-Stolley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:17 am
This is my third and final post on Engquist v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Koe v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:17 am
Circuit’s earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Friedrichs v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:26 am
That OHIM generally treats - or has treated - national law like "foreign", ie a matter of fact, is only logical, also with a view to the equality of arms on either side: an opponent, with a few ticks, can invoke nonregistered rights from around the EU. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
In that case, the plaintiff, Chris Gordon, head of security with the Irish Horseracing Regulatory Board (IHRB), had been the subject of an orchestrated and severe campaign against his good name by the defendants, the Irish Racehorse Trainers Association (the IRTA). [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
