Search for: "State v. Su"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 30,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2015, 11:40 am
By United States Mission Geneva [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)%5D, via Wikimedia CommonsA partir de la decisión emitida en Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Category: Recent Decisions Body: SC18582 - Pham v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Category: Recent Decisions Body: SC18582 - Pham v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Applying a relatively narrow reading of AT & T, the Court concluded: United States Supreme Court authority does not address a statute such as the PAGA, which is a mechanism by which the state itself can enforce state labor laws, for the employee suing under the PAGA “does so as the proxy or agent of the state's labor law enforcement agencies. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:32 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the 2003 year of account and… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:54 am
Painter in 1946, Sweatt sued, shaking the University's rigid hold on segregation and shocking a state still desperately clinging to the 'separate but equal' system. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:23 am
In Bellikoff v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court case Feres v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm
Lynd v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:58 pm
A law firms' second amended cross-complaint against a former client stated causes of action protected by the anti-SLAPP statutePhilipson & Simon v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:10 am
Here is the opinion in Pistor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
Abraxis BioScience v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
McCall's estate, parents and husband sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:02 am
Facts: In this case (Homaidan Al-Turki v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:01 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
