Search for: "Steel v. Steel" Results 1921 - 1940 of 3,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
  Judge Murphy rejected the Plaintiffs' argument, holding that: Taken to its logical conclusion, Plaintiffs’ argument—that those who are reasonably foreseeable to the maker of a representation are also known to the maker—would eviscerate the limits on liability enunciated by the Court in [Raritan River Steel Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
  Judge Murphy rejected the Plaintiffs' argument, holding that: Taken to its logical conclusion, Plaintiffs’ argument—that those who are reasonably foreseeable to the maker of a representation are also known to the maker—would eviscerate the limits on liability enunciated by the Court in [Raritan River Steel Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:49 am by Renee Newman Knake
Friday 9-10:30, Room KC 305 Loyalty & Confidences, Presenters Kathleen Clark, Brent Cotter, Carol Needham & Margaret Tarkington, Panel Chair Jim Varro 10:45-12:15, Room KC 203 Global Comparisons II, Presenters Donna Buckingham, John Law, Judy McMorrow & Michael Ogwezzy, Panel Chair Jeff Thorn 1:30-3:15, Room KC 203 LawWithoutWalls, Presenters Ray Campbell, Elizabeth Chambliss, John Flood, Tahlia Gordon, Bruce Green, Renee Newman Knake, Steve Mark, Deborah Rhode, Rob Rosen, Rita Shakel… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
E.g., regulate collective bargaining at a steel mill, because a strike at the steel mill substantially affects the interstate shipment of goods and materials to and from the mill. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The Special Prosecutor is also charged with investigating whether former President Joe Shirley acted improperly in connection with the OnSat contract with the Navajo Nation and the Navajo Nation’s guarantee of a JP Morgan Chase loan to BCDS Manufacturing, Inc., a failed Shiprock steel and fiberglass fabrication company. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:48 am by Ron Miller
In United Steel Workers of America, Local 2660 v United States Steel Corp, the Eighth Circuit held that the “unforeseeable business circumstances” exception applied to U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am by Rosalind English
Switzerland (no. 2) no. 32772/02, § 92, ECHR 2009 (rearing of animals)[Grand Chamber- GC]; Steel and Morris v . the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 89 and 95, ECHR 2005-II (fast-food meat industry); Hashman and Harrup v . the United Kingdom[GC], no. 25594/94 (hunting saboteurs); Steel and Others v . the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998 (hunting saboteurs); Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
T 0568/10 A patent in the name of Nippon Steel Corporation was opposed by Tata Steel. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
[In the following post, our guest contributor Rahul Singh analyzes the impact of CCI’s order in Builders Association of India v. [read post]