Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 1921 - 1940 of 8,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 11:46 am
”Another option would be to “to prove that the state . . . did not respect the law regarding a minor traveling,” said Muriel Fayat, a public affairs lawyer at Chatain et Associés.Legal experts interviewed by CSM say the case would not make it very far in English common-law jurisdictions, such as the United States and most Canadian provinces. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 7:50 am by Steven Cohen
  The court denied the motion to exclude/ Facts:  This case (Godelia et al v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Chevron Corp. v Steven Donziger, et al., 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. 2012), is the District Court’s most recent order in the array of cases concerning the multibillion judgment enetered against Chevron in Ecuador. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Unknown
"Forced migrants and secure belonging: a case study of Syrian refugees resettled in the United States," Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Latest Articles, 9 Dec. 2020 [abstract]- See related master's thesis. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:02 pm
Wisconsin Right to Life (05-969) and McCain, et al., v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Bethlehem Landfill Co. et al., No. 18-2691, 2019 WL 1219709 (E.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:32 am
The Secessionist Papers (Barry Lee Clark et al., The Calhoun Review, 2016) is available. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 1:40 am by Steven M. Swirsky, Paul DeCamp
It is, however, likely to have implications for employers that are subject to the myriad of workplace laws administered by the United States Department of Labor, the National Labor Relations Board and other executive branch bodies. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:59 pm by GPMfeeds
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., et al., (Case No. 2:20-cv-04240), on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:15 am by Logan Murr
Bot M8 filed suit against Sony in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement of six of their patents, five of which remain relevant on appeal: U.S. [read post]