Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 7:19 am
” Kagan described Marshall as “an incredibly gifted trial lawyer,” a part of his work she called less well known than his appellate advocacy, most famously as counsel for the petitioners in Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
It’s been gnawing at me lately for some reason: Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
In these cases, people can carry the same viral load as those who do experience symptoms. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 7:54 am
., v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Mandell-Brown, 2010-Ohio-3832 (1st Dist.) [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:38 am
Brinegar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm
Only a few people elsewhere in the courtroom are doing so. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
The Brown Act The Brown Act governs the conduct of meetings of legislative bodies of local agencies.3 This article discusses the provisions of the Brown Act that address participation by members of the public at the meetings of legislative bodies and removal of disruptive persons from meetings.4 In enacting the Brown Act, the Legislature declared that public commissions, boards, and councils exist to “aid in the conduct of the people’s… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:08 am
Souter’s second example is The Supreme Court’s decision in 1954 in Brown v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
And, meanwhile, Scalia authored Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:38 am
People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
Switzer will help ensure that the people in jail actually committed crimes, but Kentucky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
Seideneck v. [read post]
