Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit" Results 1921 - 1940 of 10,923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 3:18 pm by Jordan Bublick
Noteably, the ruling did not involve a chapter 13 situation.This ruling reversed the decision of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals located in Atlanta, which covers an area in the southeastern United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:22 am by Sandy
 On appeal, the Second Circuit held that summary judgment had been improperly granted based on the penal law rule, however, it also held that because Brazil was seeking assistance from the United States Attorney General in enforcing its forfeiture judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2467, the District Court should allow Brazil and the Attorney General time to complete this process before taking further action in the case.The decision in… [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm by David Ruiz
EFF and ACLU together urged the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to make the right decision. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Oct. 30, 2018, Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
In one of its final decisions of the term, the United States Supreme Court issued one of the most significant class-action decisions in recent years. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:44 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Second, Appellants argued that the ITC ignored evidence that the standalone packages had non-infringing uses when mounted onto a printed circuit board with underfill or sockets. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 5:26 am
United States Bank National Association, No. 06-36085 (March 2, 2007)Another burden of proof case from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
The district court found that Sanchez did not satisfy the second prong and the original panel agreed on appeal. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
The district court found that Sanchez did not satisfy the second prong and the original panel agreed on appeal. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:31 am by Patricia Salkin
On appeal the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, affirmed the holding that the gas station could not argue an equal protection claim based on alleged different treatment that the stations received, because the two stations were not similarly situated. [read post]