Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
In so holding, the Ninth Circuit was simply recognizing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Standard Fire Insurance v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 9:08 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Magistrate Judge Snow CASE NO. 07-60811-CV-COHN MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Remote sellers are exempt from collection obligations if they have less than $500,00 per year in sales in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:26 am
Like the female employees in the Wal-Mart litigation, the putative class in this case--all purchasers of Viking appliances across the United States--present similar problems with commonality. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
In Guzzo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
On June 29, 2009, the Supreme Court addressed a provocative question about the current state of workplace diversity in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:12 am
The United States Supreme Court in Miller-El [v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
It’s in the United States’ Constitution. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:21 pm
United States National Bank, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
So what follows is our best interpretation of the position of the fifty states (plus DC and Puerto Rico) on whether any presumption arises when a plaintiff claims an inadequate warning (almost every case) that a hypothetical warning (never in fact given) would have been heeded.One thing we have discovered of particular note (at least to us), is that the heeding presumption is an area where the federal courts have run amok, ignoring their obligations under the Erie Doctrine to leave… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
The United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held invalid the product configuration mark shown immediately below, for beach towels, finding the circular shape to be functional. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 6:27 am
In Burford v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:54 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:28 am
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion, adopting the federal court’s summary judgment standard as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
