Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 1921 - 1940 of 9,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am by Danielle D'Onfro
Moreover, the city and its amici contend that the court has already determined that § 542(a) permits creditors to remain in possession of debtors’ property notwithstanding § 362 in the bankruptcy chestnut United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
Bannon in Matter of Cayne v 510 Park Avenue Corp., the court dismissed Cayne’s petition on the grounds that his “overly broad” demand for records was “supported only by speculation” of mismanagement by the co-op’s board. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am by Keith Mallinson
 Justice Birss also uses the “total royalty burden” in his FRAND rate determinations. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Ultimately, the antitrust laws are meant to benefit consumers.The PI order gives both parties some guidance as to where they bear the burden of proof and on what aspects of the case they must do more going forward. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm by Richard Hunt
“Recidivism Among Federal Offenders:  A Comprehensive Overview” from the United States Sentencing Commission, which can be found at Recidivism Report from US Sentencing Commission. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals again disagreed: The trial court emphasized that it was the duty of the jury to determine the facts and whether the documents at issue were sufficient to indicate the State had met its burden of proof of as to the charge of habitual misdemeanor assault beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick discusses a new court order that prohibits the government from enforcing a final rule that sought to increase filing fees for certain applications and petitions filed with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Regardless, the United States Supreme Court has rejected such an interest as an adequate reason to impose a prior restraint. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judge Barrett was a member of a panel affirming by unpublished opinion an appeal brought by a Native prisoner in Wisconsin state prison, Schlemm v Carr. [read post]