Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 3:48 pm
Mills (Intra-Tribal Leadership Dispute, Casino Management)State of California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 6:42 am
In Fox v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 6:42 am
In Fox v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 6:42 am
In Fox v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102(1987)). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:32 pm
Of Wausau v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seat belts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
United States, a case involving the California burglary statute. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Creative Compounds, LLC, the Federal Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, which had held that a series of patents owned by Natural Alternatives International, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
On Feb. 22, the Justice Department filed a merits brief (full text) in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:55 pm
Abouselman (Water Rights)United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
As the court explained in Arellano v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
All of this suggests that performance of the State Auditor’s functions involves seeing “that the law is faithfully executed” within the meaning of Article V, Section 1 of the California Constitution. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
In this posting, I venture out from my relative comfort zone of California appellate law into the world of federal statutory interpretation conducted by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
