Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 6,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 9:11 am
Justice Sotomayor dissents in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:30 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:54 pm
United States (tribal records)Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:47 am
Let's take a look.In United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:03 pm
At least one federal case, U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
California) United States of America v. eBay, Inc., (US District Court, N.D. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm
In Estelle v Smith (451 US 454 [1981]) the United States Supreme Court considered when the questioning by a person who is not a law enforcement officer is subject to the requirements of Miranda. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
The big loser, of course, was the United States, now rated a flawed democracy because of the quantitative effects of Mr. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
In the United States, you have the right to an attorney – even if you cannot afford one. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:00 am
As the United States Supreme Court observed in its decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
The Fourth District's recent decision in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:03 am
’ United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:48 am
The SEC has also recently updated its Investor Bulletin on life settlement investments, which can be found here.The indictment in the criminal case, United States v. [read post]
