Search for: "Utter v. Utter" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm by Rick Hills
SCOTUS has not decided this question, preferring to resolve the issue on statutory grounds in Department of Commerce v House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am by Kit Case
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 1:46 pm by Donna Sokol
” Hence the importance of including the words he actually uttered from a juridical viewpoint. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:42 am by familoo
And let us not forget that the reason for much delay is beyond the control of the court or the parties, one concerning example of this is set out in the recent judgment of the President in A v DS & Ors [2012] EWHC 1442 (Fam). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:32 am by Russ Bensing
And the even bigger question in the 9th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
George Bush had it right (a sentiment I rarely utter), at least where a president has strong legislative majorities that want to work with him. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Is it really worth referring cases like this to the ECJ where the real issue is whether the facts support or detract from exhaustion of rights and any utterance by the court is, at best, tangential to the resolution of the dispute before the referring court? [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Russ Bensing
Those were some of the questions raised by State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Harris has supported these state laws and certainly did not answer the question on what limits she would support, other than saying that she supports Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
”] From yesterday's decision by Judge Frank Whitney (W.D.N.C.) in McBride v. [read post]