Search for: "WARREN V. STATE" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Tags: Broker-dealers, Exchange Act, Financial institutions, Jurisdiction, Liability standards, Regulation SHO, SEC,Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Short sales, State law, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts Holding Activists and Proxy Advisory Firms Accountable? [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am by Randy Barnett
Slavery was a private as well as a public institution, which is why the Thirteenth Amendment was not limited to state action. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Superior Court Judge Edward Torack should have alerted the husband's attorney that he and William Smith's professional relationship had resulted in litigation over the judge's departure from the firm 11 years earlier, and Smith should have alerted the court and opposing counsel that he could not give assurance that his client would not seek the judge's recusal, the Appellate Division held in Chandok v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
Many continue to assert that the adoption of a constitutional interpretation that they oppose is, as stated by Rep. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
  The Warren Court's doctrines invited all kinds of empirical lawyering, but the supply side was not there. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:42 am by Jon Hyman
State of the Unions - EFCA-Lite and the Private Sector Decline from Philip Miles’s Lawffice Space. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
The occasion, Stevens' discussion with Cliff Sloan and David McKean, the authors of The Greatest Decision (2009), an excellent social history of Chief Justice John Marshall's landmark decision on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Most American judges, since they serve at the state level, are, as in my home state of Texas, elected, which horrifies many and serves, for others, only to make the politicized nature of appointment to the courts absolutely transparent. [read post]