Search for: "Wal-mart Stores, Inc."
Results 1921 - 1940
of 1,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the court referred to the SEC staff’s no-action letter process on shareholder proposals as a “we-know-it-when-we-see-it” approach. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Wendt[15] for refusing to require plaintiffs to go beyond pleading a claim element (loss causation) despite defendants’ argument that certification analysis must address plaintiffs’ ability to prove the element at trial and Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
WellPoint, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Anybody can go down to the hardware store and buy a lawnmower for any reason (or no reason) at all. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:26 pm
(collectively, “Funai”), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, BestBuy.Com, LLC, and Best Buy Stores, L.P (all Respondents collectively, the “Respondents”). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:19 am
One of the tables had a sticker showing it was sold by Wal-Mart for $247. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
First, because the Ninth Circuit already recognized that some class members in this case may not have a constitutional right to bond hearings, the class may no longer satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:18 am
Supreme Court's holding in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
It’s a little like condemning Target for deigning to use its trucks to supply inventory only to its own stores instead of Wal-Mart’s, or, say, condemning a congressman for targeting earmarks for his own state or district. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:02 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
” Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
Although the OFCCP’s focus on current pay, rather than on pay decisions does not comport with the relevant legal standard following the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (89 EPD ¶42,827), contractors should still analyze current pay in addition to decisions impacting pay, according to experts speaking at the National Employment Law Institute’s (NELI) Thirty-First Annual Affirmative Action Briefing in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
Applying Wal-Mart Stores, I conclude that the released conduct would not arise out of the “identical factual predicate” as the conduct that is the subject of the settled claims. 396 F.3d at 107 (citation omitted). c. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:07 pm
It’s a little like condemning Target for deigning to use its trucks to supply inventory only to its own stores instead of Wal-Mart’s, or, say, condemning a congressman for targeting earmarks for his own state or district. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-10761 (11th Cir. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Duane Reade, Inc., 342 NLRB 1016, 1017 (2004). [read post]
