Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 9:34 pm
The same tag team of bloggers has attacked the lawyer in the same case, famed GOP litigator Ted Olson who argued and won Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:28 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Baxendale- Walker v Middleton & Ors [2011] EWHC 998 (QB) (18 April 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) NXT, R (on the application of) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 969 (Admin) (15 April 2011) Puri, R (on the application of) v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2011] EWHC 970 (Admin) (15 April 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:45 am
Guayara v Harry I. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:53 am
Their $600,000 verdict for the plaintiff has now been upheld on appeal in Phillipps v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
Walker The First Amendment Free Speech clause states, “Congress . . . shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
The trial went forward without broadcast, but with the proceedings videotaped; in August, Judge Walker struck down the ballot measure under the federal Constitution; the case is now pending on appeal in the Ninth Circuit (Perry, et al., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:06 am
See Nupla Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:59 pm
On February 23, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Walker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
Others, like David Walker, prescribe tax changes or better disclosure. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:54 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:26 am
It also presented evidence that D’Cunha stated that he was not interested in the Sussex opening in February 2002. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:18 am
In Appling v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
I thoroughly appreciate the difficult position that Professor Cronon finds himself in, especially as I am a public official in the state of Florida, which has arguably the most exacting sunshine laws in the country (enshrined in our state constitution no less) and where one of the key state supreme court decisions enforcing the open meeting act concerned a dean search at my law school (Wood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. [read post]
