Search for: "Yes Care"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 16,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 1:08 pm
And yes, domain still do matter, not the way we thought they would, as Marty said, in 1994 (or 1998, when I was litigating about them), but the “dot-com presumption” is still meaningful. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:08 am
Yes, you read that correctly. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:21 am
This coming from The City Paper, a former Tennessee executive for Iasis Healthcare, one of Tennessee's largest health care companies, has blown the whistle in a False Claims lawsuit. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Pauly, Wharton School economist, is famous for cooking up the individual mandate at the behest of Republicans who wanted to preserve private insurance from governmental control of health care. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 9:04 pm
Yes, the present moment certainly sounds inviting. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:22 am
Yes. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 12:53 am
Back when employers were freezing or terminating retiree medical care plans, affected employees were suing based on conflicts between plan documents and employee communication materials. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:01 pm
In response to the President's comments about the Affordable Care Act yesterday, Judge Smith of the Fifth Circuit decided to beat up a lawyer for the Government. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:22 am
Yes. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:57 am
I suppose my first inclination, in attempting an answer to this question, is, "Who Cares? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
I don’t know and I don’t care. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 12:08 pm
Let me first address one obvious point – yes, I made this scenario up. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 10:07 am
The answer is yes, you can! [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:09 am
And, yes, counter-cyclical hiring is great! [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 5:33 am
" And yet, "He takes care of his father. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:09 pm
Yes, the Inspector General should have more funds to hire more agents, analysts and data scientists. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:55 am
Yes it is, but hey I didn’t make up the rules, I only follow them. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:49 am
So, that won't work here.This SCOV does say: the family division may consider non-statutory factors such as the welfare of the animal and the emotional connection between the animal and each spouse—which includes evidence about its (yes, “its,” since right now, “it's” only property) daily routine, comfort and care. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Yes! [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
The Court answered yes to both questions, based on the text, structure and purposes of the act.But on a deeper level, King v. [read post]
