Search for: "Young v. United States"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm
United States 22-163Issues: (1) Whether the limits on agency deference announced in Kisor v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
Through this case, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
It does not aim at marriage, but, rather, at preventing early parenthood and investing in young people’s education and human capital.Sawhill proposes to “change the default” to reduce the staggeringly high percentage of unplanned and unwanted births in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
His story is told through a lawsuit to which he was party, the landmark United States Supreme Court decision Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:30 am
There’s been such creativity in the protests in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
– “The great modern sandpit will now have to rein it in, tamed by knowledge that the whiff of a suggestion could land you in court” And… The Tweeting Lawyer has a view: Lessons from #McAlpine v #Bercow Finally for today ( I will return on the morrow…perhaps…hopefully etc etc)… from Legal Cheek – a prolix and rather pompous statement from a young pupil barrister. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
– “The great modern sandpit will now have to rein it in, tamed by knowledge that the whiff of a suggestion could land you in court” And… The Tweeting Lawyer has a view: Lessons from #McAlpine v #Bercow Finally for today ( I will return on the morrow…perhaps…hopefully etc etc)… from Legal Cheek – a prolix and rather pompous statement from a young pupil barrister. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm
Justice Kirstjanson grounded her decision in international legal principles such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada in A.C. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:18 pm
Such a maneuver would have reached the Court in the midst of its continuing deliberations on how to decide the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Christopher Young v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:57 am
In Rubinstein v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am
The Obama administration had initiated DACA to help the "Dreamers": foreign nationals who entered the United States as children, accompanying parents who entered the country unlawfully. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Another Year, Another Attempt in Congress to Ban Non-Competes Nationwide Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) introduced legislation in 2019 entitled the Workforce Mobility Act (“WMA”). [read post]
