Search for: "**jackson v. Long" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  In any event, HC’s averments of reasonable diligence (ie section 11(3) of the 1973 Act) and of error induced by the solicitors (ie section 6(4), with the proviso of “reasonable diligence”) are, in my opinion, sufficient to entitle HC to a proof before answer in each case, all pleas standing:  see paragraph [62] et seq below. 20‑year long negative  prescription:  section 7 [6]        As I have reached the view… [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
”[3]  Throughout our long constitutional journey, the borrowing power remains undiminished by practice or doctrine or interpretation. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:53 am by Eric Claeys
Jackson Women's Health Center is currently before the Supreme Court, and the litigants in Dobbs believe that the case presents the question whether Roe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
As Professor Feldman explains, Madison’s refusal flew in the face of long-standing custom. [read post]
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It has been long recognized that “ethical system[s] must be framed as to prevent judges from being activists, mavericks, [and] publicity-seekers”.[93] In view of this, judicial fundraising presents ethical problems as it can directly or indirectly result in a judge being publically associated with an organization as its advocate. [read post]