Search for: "Any and All Under-Tenants "
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 pm
They allow the council to claw back all the housing benefit paid on a property for the past 12 months and a tenant to also claw back all the rent (not HB) paid during the same period, but only if the council prosecuted. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
Our firm has represented many tenants in actions relating to breaches of warranty of habitability, as well as in disputes with cooperatives, and looks forward to all inquiries in these areas. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 11:31 am
This is a legal process that takes place under the supervision of a court. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 1:39 pm
The successor trustee has a Duty of Impartiality under the California Probate Code. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
At the hearing – the first hearing – the DJ took it that Mr F could apply under s.85(2) Housing Act 1985 to vary any order made. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
At the hearing – the first hearing – the DJ took it that Mr F could apply under s.85(2) Housing Act 1985 to vary any order made. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 1:19 am
Read all about it here … Can a protected tenant insist on a buyout? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 5:55 pm
NO When a person murders his or her spouse, under Florida law the couple's jointly-titled residence is deemed converted into tenants-in-common property. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" Likewise, even if landlords respond only by legally and evenhandedly checking all tenants' criminal histories, "refusing to rent to anyone with arrests or convictions for any crime that could have involved a gang" would "unfairly deprive many Californians of housing. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Such plan features automatically enroll all eligible employees at described deferral rates and absent any contrary instructions from the employee, provide for a continuing elective deferral contribution invested in the plan's qualified default investment alternative (like a target date retirement fund). [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
Here, no such ongoing use was obvious because there were no structures at all on 60 Clarendon. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:44 pm
Under s83(4) the act states that this must include (a) a description of each fee that is sufficient to enable a person who is liable to pay it to understand the service or cost that is covered by the fee or the purpose for which it is imposed (as the case may be), (b) in the case of a fee which tenants are liable to pay, an indication of whether the fee relates to each dwelling-house or each tenant under a tenancy of the dwelling-house; and (c)… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:28 pm
When this measure is signed into law, landlords will be prohibited from harassing, threatening, or evicting tenants based on any perceived immigration or citizenship status. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
She had, in 2013 filed something with the IRS to be relieved of the 2010 debt, but it wasn’t clear whether she knew that there was a lien regarding that debt.In any case, the sale went sideways and Wife had some tenants in the house who had to move out. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
Under California law, once a property deed is recorded, it is considered notification to all the world of the transfer. [read post]
13 May 2013, 3:39 pm
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 6:43 am
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:16 am
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
Therefore, in effect, this cancels out or should be taken to cancel out any negative effects of the Scheme which after all only concerns 20% of the stock. [read post]
