Search for: "Attorney Goldstein"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, represents the petitioners in the case, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am
[Disclosures: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Lane and was among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Schuette. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in the case.] [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Bureau of Indian Affairs 19-1166Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:15 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Henson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
”[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:08 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:09 am
Richmond Metal Fin, 756 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985) [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
’” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Husted 16-1068 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System 20-222Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd The question before the Court in al-Kidd is whether former Attorney General John Ashcroft is immune from a suit alleging that he used the material witness statutes as a pretext to investigate and detain terrorism suspects after September 11th. [read post]
