Search for: "B. Smith"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 3:28 am
The record establishes in particular, the parties' stipulation that defendants committed malpractice in representing plaintiff that such fees and expenses total $15,342.43, and plaintiff is entitled to interest from the date that his damages were incurred, i.e., the date that the fees were paid (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Harris v Bonacci, 109 AD2d at 1074; CPLR 5001 [b]). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
I recently came across two new auto insurance class actions filed in West Virginia and Oklahoma, which I thought would be of interest to readers of my blog: Smith v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
However there is an exemption in 17 USC 110(5)(B) for displays that comply with certain limitations. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Art 37.07(3) and Art. 42.12(5)(b), in that the court did not hear the initial plea and failed to conduct a presentence investigation or allow for the presentation of evidence in mitigation of punishment.For a summary of the underlying case, click here.Robert Lee Meneffe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:01 am
Conference Organizers Professor Michael B. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:28 pm
B. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:58 am
Smith, 229 F.3d 992, 996 (10th Cir.2000), and In re U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:13 am
The 9th (B. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am
B. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:32 am
Smith. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
Bédard, 2017 SCC 4 https://t.co/WGvJPrUxo0 -> A Tale of Two Cakes: Can Copyright Law Protect this Cake Design? [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
William B. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
The court held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) requires that leave to amend pleadings be freely granted, but Rule 16(b) says that scheduling orders that set deadlines can be revised only on a showing of good cause. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
VirtualKathryn Taylor (Ocado)FD120205:30pm, 14 September 20239 September 20234In person – EdinburghAlistair Hindle (Hindles)FD420205:30pm, 13 September 20234 September 20233In person – EdinburghRebecca Douglas (Hindles)FD120195:30pm, 22 August 202314 August 20235VirtualWilliam Smith (D Young & Co)FD420226:00pm, 4 September 202325 August 20235VirtualKathryn Taylor (Ocado)Workshops FocusDates and TimesWorkshop LeadMaximum group sizeYear/QuestionLocationFD4 Claim… [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:44 am
Boyle Jr. and Michael B. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Smith and H. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:33 pm
California law and cases on point include, among others: California Family Code section 2641 California Family Code section 2627 California Family Code section4320(b) and (d) In re Marriage of Lucas (1980) 27 C3d 808In re Marriage of Watt (1989) 214 CA3d 340In re Marriage of Rocha (1998) 68 CA4th 514Marriage of Graham (2003) 109 CA4th 1321Marriage of Ostler & Smith (1990) 223 CA3d 33 If education costs and/or student loan payments are issues in your California case and… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Uddin, Clark B. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Smith, Judge Carl E. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff 2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal quotation marks… [read post]
