Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 6,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2022, 7:12 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett issued an opinion, in which Justice Clarence Thomas joined, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
Writing for the (all-Republican-appointed) majority, Justice Thomas found that: (1) in light of the district court's probing for bias during voir dire, the decision not to ask the precise question requested about media coverage was a permissible exercise of discretion; and (2) the district court also did not abuse its discretion by excluding the evidence of the triple-murder by Tamerlan, as that evidence relied on statements by now-dead witnesses, was tangential, and was thus potentially… [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:05 pm
“The fate of American elections is in Amy Coney Barrett’s hands; A pair of cases on the Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ could eviscerate legal safeguards protecting free and fair elections”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 5:50 pm
Justice Barrett filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Gorsuch joined. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:53 pm
Judge Jackson would be only the third African American to serve on the Court (after Justices Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas) and the sixth woman (after Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Amy Coney Barrett). [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:18 am
“The Bygone Boutique Law Firm That Enticed Ketanji Brown Jackson and Amy Coney Barrett; A legendary Washington law firm that is remembered for attracting young talent, including future Supreme Court justices”: Tony Mauro has this post at his “The Marble Palace Blog. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the majority’s opinion, but she also penned a separate concurring opinion, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:33 am
From Justice Barrett's concurrence: In this case, the First Circuit asserted "supervisory power" to impose a procedural rule on the District Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 8:58 am
Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion for the court, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 6:01 am
Posted by Martin Gelter (Fordham University), on Wednesday, March 2, 2022 Tags: COVID-19, Globalization, Institutional Investors, International governance, Protectionism, Stakeholders Board Disclosure of Race and Ethnicity Gains Traction Posted by Susan Angele, Annalisa Barrett, and Stephen Brown, KPMG, on Wednesday, March 2, 2022 Tags: Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Diversity, ESG, Human capital, Listing… [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 12:53 pm
Breyer’s opinion for the court, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and in large part by Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, stressed that although the court was faced with “only a narrow evidentiary dispute,” it did not condone terrorism or torture. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
Justice Alito wrote for the Court, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:13 am
KAVANAUGH, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, in which BARRETT, J., joined. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:01 am
Kavanaugh issued an opinion, in which Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined, concurring in part. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
Four justices — Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Kagan, and Barrett — emphasized that the relevant events occurred on the border. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:07 am
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, bypassed the quorum requirement and gaveled Barrett forward to the full Senate anyway. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:41 pm
That's in part because of Biden's campaign pledge to nominate a black woman, which has been attacked by Republicans, despite the fact that race and gender played important roles in previous nominations, such as Ronald Reagan's campaign promise to nominate a woman (resulting in the nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor), and Trump's promise to name a woman to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg (leading to the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
” A very similar foursome (minus Barrett, plus Justice Neil Gorsuch) wrote a similar statement concurring in the denial of review in another free exercise clause case just a few years ago because unresolved issues made review inappropriate “at this stage. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:27 am
Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett pressed both sides on where the standard for the exception comes from, noting that the phrases “good faith” and “honest effort” appear nowhere in the statute and that the entirety of the exception, which likewise does not specify an intent standard, is the product of regulation. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:03 am
Posted by Susan Angele, Annalisa Barrett, and Stephen Brown, KPMG, on Wednesday, March 2, 2022 Editor's Note: Susan Angele, Annalisa Barrett, and Stephen Brown are Board Leadership Senior Advisors at KPMG. [read post]
