Search for: "Ball v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
Boeing Co., 662 F.2d 975 (3d Cir. 1981); see also State Contracting & Eng'g Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
Recently, the Supreme Court acting in its legislative capacity voted on January 21, 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:16 am
Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am
During their final two-hour confrontation on the issue, the book states that Mr Brown asked Mr Blair: “Who do you think is better than me? [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
This essay moves the ball forward in important ways. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm
Thus, plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract, inasmuch as "no contract of any kind exists between plaintiff and defendant and there is no recognized theory upon which defendant . . . might be held liable to plaintiff, as a third-party beneficiary" (Area Masonry v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 64 AD2d 810, 811). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
Distinguishing between an individual’s “domicile” and his or her “residence” for the purpose of meeting a “residence requirement” for employmentMatter of Ball v City of Syracuse, 2010 NY Slip Op 01037, decided on February 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Syracuse City Charter provides that employees "shall be at the time of their appointment and continue to be during their continuance in the employment of the city,… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:51 pm
Drawing on Ball, the Ninth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009).However, in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:17 am
V. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
After reading the recent case of Hammond v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
As Barbara reminded the Commission in her net neutrality filing, “Section 230(b)(2) flatly declares that it is the policy of the United States ? [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:27 am
Eugene Volokh explains the substance of this decision: United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm
McMahon on Barger Wolen’s Litigation Management and Attorney Fee Analysis Blog The Combs v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
(See Richardson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
.” Then, delivered with a pause and an eyebrow raise, Bouchard boldly stated, “The biggest amount I could find—almost as big as me—about 9 inches.” For a TV meteorologist to reveal his most private of measurements, would take, eh, balls. [read post]
