Search for: "Brothers v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am by lawmrh
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am by Rob Merges
If the invention requires some intervention, but not a huge amount, we have a close case, the canonical instance being Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Ofcom stated that the financial penalty was issued due to the “seriousness and repeated nature of this breach,” and will require the broadcaster to publish a statement of its findings on a date determined by the regulator. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:54 am by James Denvil and Tim Wybitul
On September 5, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a ruling in the case of Bărbulescu v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:54 am by James Denvil and Tim Wybitul
On September 5, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a ruling in the case of Bărbulescu v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
That memory has to be false though because Bugs Bunny is a Warner Brothers character and not part of the Disney universe. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
Kassab v Kassab, 56 Misc 3d 1213(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 50986(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Aug. 3, 2017], in which the trial court conditionally granted a minority shareholder’s petition to dissolve a realty-owning corporation co-owned by his brother based largely on post-petition oppressive conduct, and ordered a buyout based on the court’s fair-value determination that excluded any discount for lack of marketability. [read post]