Search for: "C Husbands" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 4:36 am
I am one of three daughters, and my husband and I have two daughters and a granddaughter. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court decided that: (i) D pays C’s costs on the standard basis up to 16 Dec 2010 (ii) There be no order of costs between 17 Dec 2010 and 10 April 2011 (owing to the temporary withdrawal of the offer) (iii) C pays D’s costs after that date on the standard basis, including the costs of the trial and appeal. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Under section 469(c)(7)(B), a taxpayer is a real estate professional if two conditions are satisfied. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm by Eliana Baer
Both parties were members of the New Jersey Bar and the husband had an active private practice. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Section 98 (1) provides:Subject to this Part of this Act, a court shall not make an order for possession of a dwelling-house which is for the time being let on a protected tenancy or subject to a statutory tenancy unless the court considers it reasonable to make such an order and either—(a) the court is satisfied that suitable alternative accommodation is available for the tenant or will be available for him when the order in question takes effect, or (b) the circumstances are as specified in… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Section 98 (1) provides:Subject to this Part of this Act, a court shall not make an order for possession of a dwelling-house which is for the time being let on a protected tenancy or subject to a statutory tenancy unless the court considers it reasonable to make such an order and either—(a) the court is satisfied that suitable alternative accommodation is available for the tenant or will be available for him when the order in question takes effect, or (b) the circumstances are as specified in… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Sobeys Québec inc. c. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Marty Lederman
But the IRS denied the refund claim on the ground that Windsor is not a “spouse” within the meaning of DOMA Section 3, which provides that “[i]n determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, . . . the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife”; thus, Windsor could not be a “surviving spouse” within the meaning of the refund statute. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:43 am by Spencer L. Reames
EPTL 5-1.2 (a)(5) provides that a husband or wife is disqualified as a surviving spouse under the EPTL, for purposes of intestate distribution, among other things, if it is established that the husband or wife abandoned the deceased spouse and such abandonment continued until the time of death. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
McCain 2012 ONSC 7344[1] The Applicant, Christine McCain (“the Wife”) brings a Motion seeking the following interim/temporary relief from the Court in her Application against the Respondent, Michael McCain (“the Husband”): . . . . [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am by Jon McLaughlin
The statute specifies that children born of a bigamous marriage are legitimate and are entitled to the same considerations regarding child support as children of a monogamous marriage. 750 ILCS 5/212(c), 5/303. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
C-34, s. 151). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:29 pm
  Try saying that three times fast.P.P.S. - One of the attorney losers in the case is Lars C. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  Arthur Miller – the civil procedure guru, not the improbable husband of Marilyn Monroe – is on the petition as Of Counsel. [read post]