Search for: "CUSTODY OF D T" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Accordingly, [Boyer’s] [§ 1983] claim against t Rice for the illegal search and seizure of his cell phone is barred by Heck v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Shea Denning
  If subjective motives aren’t relevant in the latter context, it is hard for me to understand why they might matter in the former. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 10:14 am by Gritsforbreakfast
While the inmate technically may no longer be in custody, there is a very real possibility that the events that contributed to their death occurred while they were in custody and preceded their PR Bond or transfer to the hospital. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
’s claim for custody of the children at an early stage in the case, and then unreasonably and aggressively stuck to that plan until March 29, 2012, to the detriment of the children. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:27 pm by Sarena
The reality is that we can't always care as much as we'd like. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:13 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But in this case there are so many positive anecdotal accolades for such programs it'd be nice to get some evidence-driven analysis of what happens with inmates who participate after they leave custody. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  The police didn’t give Miranda warnings on this occasion, deliberately so:  they’d concluded that if they did, Dixon would ask for a lawyer. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 He’d been prepared to plead guilty to the public order offence, but was stunned at this new tack; that the rowers he’d caused distress to were no longer the issue, that he’d somehow caused the public offence, as he states, “I felt sympathetic towards the rowers, but the judge made it clear it wasn’t about them; they became a non-entity in the charge. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 He’d been prepared to plead guilty to the public order offence, but was stunned at this new tack; that the rowers he’d caused distress to were no longer the issue, that he’d somehow caused the public offence, as he states, “I felt sympathetic towards the rowers, but the judge made it clear it wasn’t about them; they became a non-entity in the charge. [read post]