Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Under both the FLSA and California law, the employer has the burden of proving the one of the exemptions applies—establishing exempt status is an “affirmative defense” in wage/hour litigation. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:51 pm
" An employer is prohibited from discharging, discriminating or retaliating against an employee "for taking time off to serve as required by law on an inquest jury or trial jury, if the employee, prior to taking time off, gives reasonable notice to the employer that he or she is required to serve. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:28 am
  The employee filed an administrative complaint with the Department of Fair Employment & Housing on April 5, 2006 and received a right-to-sue letter on April 14, 2006. [read post]
A closely-divided California Supreme Court has dealt employment arbitrations a potentially huge setback. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
“When A Speech Code Is A Speech Code: The Stanford Policy and the Theory of Incidental Restraints,” University of California at Davis Law Review. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Mandelman
  They lived out past Hemet in a place called Menifee, California, that I had never heard of before, even though I’d lived in California for twenty years. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Biker and Motorcycle Law,  Child Safety, practice At The Schoolhouse Gate, Special Education Law, You may be more geographic specific like New York Personal Injury, Chicago IP Litigation, California Condo and HOA Law, Maryland Father’s Rights, Florida Estate Planning. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:16 pm by Peter Rost
.'' Some court actions, especially in California, have ruled in favor of unjustly dismissed corporate whistle blowers. [read post]
Under California law, it is generally only necessary that the worker be subject to the "control of the employer" or "all the time the employee is suffered or permitted to work" in order to be entitled to pay. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:23 am
  The issue often arises as to whether these interns have to be treated as employees subject to California and/or federal wage and hour laws. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
  As an example, officials in California have issued guidance letters to advise employers whether they are breaking the law. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:26 pm by SOIssues
Among them: California has had a series of cases involving people who were exonerated of abuse allegations yet struggled to get their names off the state's Child Abuse Central Index. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the California city and its police department will be Kent L. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm by Yokum
On April 7, 2010, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) issued an opinion letter addressing the requirements employers must meet in order to have unpaid interns in compliance with California law. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm by Yokum
On April 7, 2010, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) issued an opinion letter addressing the requirements employers must meet in order to have unpaid interns in compliance with California law. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
By Dan Forman California's Division of Labor Standards Enforcement recently issued a new Opinion Letter holding that partial day deductions from vacation or sick leave accruals for exempt employees who are absent for a partial day are permissible under California law and do not cause the loss of exempt status for such employees. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:15 am by admin
Please contact the Ranchod Law Group with offices in San Francisco, San Jose Bay Area, and Sacramento California, at info@ranchodlaw.com or at 415-986-6186 if you have any questions regarding L-1 visas or immigration. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:30 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  Instead of turning the priest over to law enforcement authorities, Benedict suggested that he be transferred into another diocese, and the letter hints that the new diocese ought not to be told of the man's history. [read post]