Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 1941 - 1960 of 11,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
Without any support from either trademark law or publicity rights law, the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct thus manufactured, in a 2 page opinion without any citations, a new intellectual property right for the state of Ohio. * * * The opinion also doesn’t engage with the other state bar opinions or rules directly on point. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Witness as the Dubitante studies a conflict between tribal sovereign immunity and a California cigarette tax. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The exchange came after a two-year court battle for McGahn’s testimony. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:31 pm by luiza
Although Integra successfully survived Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in its California case, the result was later overturned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, ending that case. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Unknown
, I focused on the dilemma of whether candy bars made with flour are candy subject to the sales tax or baked goods exempt from that tax. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 3:05 pm by The Nourmand Law Firm, APC
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is a federal appeals court located in San Francisco, California, and has jurisdiction over federal cases in California, Arizona, Nevada, and several other states. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:38 pm by Molly Lockwood
He has argued 14 cases in the California Supreme Court and appeared in all six of the California District Courts of Appeal, as well as trial courts around the State. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:35 am
That includes our stakeholders and partners in other agencies, the bar and others. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
But even if there is no question whether the plaintiff is in fact able to file his complaint in state court, there is still the question of why the plaintiff has chosen to file in state rather than federal court. [read post]
United States on June 3 was a significant victory for civil liberties groups, researchers, the defense bar and others troubled by the broad reading of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) urged by the government. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Vows to End Court Orders Seeking Journalists’ Data in Leak Probes Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 6/5/2021 The U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
In 1991, the United States Supreme Court adopted this position and held (emphasis added): If an involuntary Chapter 11 debtor fails to cooperate, this likely will provide the requisite “cause” for the bankruptcy court to convert the Chapter 11 case to one under Chapter 7. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:41 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
Courts have routinely ruled that online platforms are not transformed into a state actor subject to First Amendment constraints solely because they provide a forum for speech. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
If the sixty-day bar dates of Rules 4004(a) and 1017(e) have passed, and no one has asked the Court to extend either of those deadlines prior to their expiration, then unless one of the exceptions in Rule 4004(c)(1) applies, the Court must forthwith enter the discharge. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
Davis, where different state court judges reached opposite conclusions on Petitioner’s constitutional claim and where all lower federal and state court authority disagrees with the California Supreme Court’s holding on this constitutional claim. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:54 am
She went on to appear multiple times before the state Supreme Court and in appellate courts throughout the state. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:20 pm by Nassiri Law
Supreme Court upheld several protections for LGBTQ people, but as our Los Angeles LGBTQ employment attorneys recognize, federal laws are needed to protect those in a growing number of states passing statutes that restrict LGBTQ rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:35 am by Amy Howe
Specifically, the court in Rostker reasoned that the purpose of registration was to replace combat troops, but women were barred at the time from serving in combat. [read post]