Search for: "California State Board of Equalization"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
It should be noted here that the State of California initiated its audit of Dr. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm
But you may collect from your customer an amount equal to the tax you will owe. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales: United… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
According to the Franchise Tax Board and the California state tax agency, if a company is suspended, that company will lose the rights to its name, it will be unable to sue or be represented in court, its contracts will be unenforceable and it will not be able to do business in California. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
The bill would not have applied to the state, its subdivisions, or any city, county, city and county, or special district._____________________________ AB 537 - Swanson - Family and medical leave.This bill would have increased the circumstances under which an employee is entitled to protected leave pursuant to the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Cases and items related to equal employment opportunitySource: EEO/iNews - iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity, © 2008 John D. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
California Appellate Districts, December 16, 2008 Arcadia Dev. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Tom F. (06-637) but affirmed the opinion below by an equally divided vote.) [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Mukasey, No. 07-60740 Petition for review of a final order of removal is denied where: 1) a prior cancellation of removal did not erase petitioner's conviction for possession of marijuana for immigration purposes, and that conviction was admissible in the removal proceeding; and 2) petitioner's equal-protection challenge failed because he did not demonstrate that he was similarly situated to other aliens who were granted admission. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
A key difference between this case and the recent winning cases in California and Connecticut is that the procreation issue was pretty much off the table in California and Connecticut because those states had already legislatively adopted a "separate but equal" status for same-sex couples that conferred all parental rights and responsibilities that marriage would confer, so the state could hardly argue in either case that marriage… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Garcia, the statute of limitations apply with equal force to section 1983 method-of-execution action; 2) the limitations period begins to accrue on the date direct review of a plaintiff's conviction and sentence is complete; 3) the district court correctly found that the statute of limitations has run for each of the three remaining plaintiffs; and 4) there was no reason to hold that the statute of limitations has been tolled. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:45 am
BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, SJC-10157. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
Tilton (Tilton) (collectively appellants).1 The protocol,Operational Procedure No. 0-770, is formally titled, "STATE OF CALIFORNIA SANQUENTIN OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE NUMBER 0-770 EXECUTION BYLETHAL INJECTION" (hereafter OP 770). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Mississippi Board of Pharmacy, No. 08-60372 (5th Cir. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
California Equal Protection Jury Selection — Batson Challenges: Snyder v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:21 pm
President Bush Issues Executive Order Pushing NextGen Forward - Costa Mesa lawyer Steven Taber of Chevalier, Allen & Lichman on the firm's Aviation and Airport Development Law Blog Governor Schwarzenegger Strikes Again: 33% RPS by 2020 and Streamlined Renewable Energy Permitting in California - Sacramento attorney Allison Cook of Stoel Rives on the firm's blog, Renewable + Law Digital Copyright Questions Deserve Answers - First Amendment authority… [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:37 am
(And equally encouraged by their genuine eagerness to support Barack.) [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 1:43 pm
Everything else equal, the expected deviation is about $1.5 million larger if VCs lack a board majority and roughly $1.6 million larger if the firm is incorporated in California (rather than Delaware), which gives common shareholders relatively more leverage against the VCs through that state's bundle of common shareholder rights. [read post]
