Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2016, 7:26 am by Eric Goldman
Provide Commerce * Texas Ethics Opinion Approves Competitive Keyword Ads By Lawyers * Court Beats Down Another Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuit–Beast Sports v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Should the Department look to the State of California’s law (requiring that 50 percent of an employee’s time be spent exclusively on work that is the employee’s primary duty) as a model? [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:07 am by Kate Fort
This is a pretty standard unpublished ICWA notice case (there have been 62 so far this year, 53 out of California, 3 from Michigan, 2 from Texas, and 1 each from Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, and New Jersey). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Perry – that involved an Establishment Clause challenge to a six-foot-high, three-feet-wide Ten Commandments monument that sits at the corner between the Texas State Capitol and the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:50 pm by Sasha Volokh
The background for this dispute begins with California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:26 am by Joe Consumer
The key test, which the justices laid out in a 2014 decision called Daimler AG v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Legal Talk Network
In July, a sniper, later identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, opened fire at a march against fatal police shootings, held in downtown Dallas, Texas, killing 5 police officers and wounding many others. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
If enacted, the bill would initially cover over a dozen states including California, Texas, Florida, New York, and most of the Deep South. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
Hasen is Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This was a curious ruling at the time—three years after the California Supreme Court had said the opposite in the famous Marvin v. [read post]