Search for: "Commitment of M B"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
The final climax of the movie is Major Thomas’ summing up speech to the court which both charges the army with hypocrisy and argues that war changes men, stating that: “the barbarities of war are committed by normal men in abnormal circumstances who cannot be judged by civilian rules. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
If the government promulgates such a modification to its regulation, it might mollify some of the nonprofit plaintiff organizations; but I think it is likely that most of those organizations will not be satisfied: They will argue that such a “fix,” too, violates their rights under RFRA, because their act of opting out will continue to establish the legal authority for the government to require another party to provide coverage.If I’m right about that, and if… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:44 pm
Halliburton would report to the DOJ the results of its high risk due diligence. b) Within 120 days of Closing. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
Three judges who also took part in the ruling — Chief Judge Merrick B. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
That said, I’m going to call this for the state, as are both student contributors. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
I'm done with your unethical behavior. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
Thus, even though the employer was within its rights to fire him for insubordination, his single act of disobedience did not constitute misconduct disqualifying him from receiving unemployment compensation benefits (Paratransit, Inc v Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, July 3, 2014, Baxter, M). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Wilson, M. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:47 pm
According to Judge B. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
(I’m embarrassed for AEI.) [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
On 28 May 2013 a Chamber of the Fifth Section, composed of Mark Villiger, President, Angelika Nußberger, Boštjan M. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:26 pm
While the SEC finally did implement the lifting of the ban on general solicitation by creating the new Rule 506(c), it also has proposed new onerous rules governing its use (as well as the use of the existing Rule 506(b)). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:26 pm
While the SEC finally did implement the lifting of the ban on general solicitation by creating the new Rule 506(c), it also has proposed new onerous rules governing its use (as well as the use of the existing Rule 506(b)). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
I’m hoping an analogy to the decision whether to attend law school is emerging. [read post]
How an IRB Could Have Legitimately Approved the Facebook Experiment—and Why that May Be a Good Thing
29 Jun 2014, 8:05 pm
[Update as I’m wrapping up this post: the first author, Adam Kramer of Facebook, confirms—on Facebook, of course—that they did indeed want to investigate the theory that seeing friends’ positive content makes users sad.] [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
Did Congress just not notice that materiality is a requirement under §43(a)(1)(B) (as it should be under §43(a)(1)(A))? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
George, who was unable to attend the annual meeting of shareholders due to a family commitment. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 10:49 am
" "Given proper treatment, the sheriff argues, some patients would not be committing the crimes of which they are accused. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:17 am
(image from http://commandercheesecake.tumblr.com/post/26772882033)From a recent question posed to the Firm on an online forum: Question: I'm dating a 16 year old and I'm 22. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
” Another internal document said that KIND had an “advantage” in packaging because of its “large clear window” and because its “claims are clearly indicated on the front wrapper”; an email instructed a team member to “[b]ring multiple KIND bars” to a MOJO redesign meeting; a presentation indicated that one “packaging objective[ ]” was to “[c]ompete head-to-head with Kind” by incorporating a “[l]arger… [read post]
