Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
To accomplish its goals, the BPD engaged a private company, Persistent Surveillance Solutions, to fly three planes over Baltimore during daytime hours. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:12 pm
The court noted that applying different limitation periods to different BIPA claims was reasonable because “each duty is separate and distinct,” such that a company could violate one duty while complying with others. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:23 am
This, however, is frequently not the case with many of the files we work on, even with very sophisticated companies and brands. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:59 pm
Although the BIPA is silent as to the applicable statute of limitations, the panel concluded that claims brought under section 15(a), (b), and (e) of the statute, which are the claims requiring companies to have a publicly available policy, obtain informed consent, and reasonably safeguard biometric data, are subject to a five-year limitations period. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:59 pm
Although the BIPA is silent as to the applicable statute of limitations, the panel concluded that claims brought under section 15(a), (b), and (e) of the statute, which are the claims requiring companies to have a publicly available policy, obtain informed consent, and reasonably safeguard biometric data, are subject to a five-year limitations period. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:26 am
In sum, the Appellate Court held that a one-year limitations period pursuant to 13-201 governs actions under sections 15(c) and (d) of the BIPA, while a five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 13-205 applies to sections 15(a), (b), and (e). [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:26 am
In sum, the Appellate Court held that a one-year limitations period pursuant to 13-201 governs actions under sections 15(c) and (d) of the BIPA, while a five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 13-205 applies to sections 15(a), (b), and (e). [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:52 am
Section 15(c) forbids companies from profiting from an individual’s biometric data, and section 15(d) prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of biometric data without the subject’s consent. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
However, the company is not a mere “technical distributor” of opinions. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:23 am
§ 271(e)(2)(C). [2] AbbVie Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:17 am
If I’ve given them the discount and then find out they’ve changed energy supplier back to a non green company because it was cheaper, how can I say to them I’m going to increase their rent back to the previous level, when they’re telling me they need to save money. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:17 am
If I’ve given them the discount and then find out they’ve changed energy supplier back to a non green company because it was cheaper, how can I say to them I’m going to increase their rent back to the previous level, when they’re telling me they need to save money. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 10:54 am
After the debriefing, a bid protest attorney can (a) help identify any issues with the agency’s evaluation, (b) analyze whether your company was treated fairly in comparison to the awardee, (c) analyze whether the agency followed the terms of the soli [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 7:29 am
Likewise, Rule 9(b) was satisfied. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:07 am
Referring to the principles established by the CJEU in Huawei (C-170/13, decision of 16 July 2015), the Court noted that Sisvel had negotiated the potential FRAND license only with ZTE Corporation, the parent company. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 1:01 pm
As such, the products are misbranded and illegal under the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:35 am
CSIS Senior Vice President Jon B. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 5:54 am
In March 2005, Chase Life Insurance Company, the predecessor to Protective Life Insurance Company, issued a $1 million term life insurance policy to William McHugh. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am
In reality, your opposing counsel will let you know via objection if the lay opinion witness does not meet these requirements “If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness’ testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness, and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of the witness’ testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and (c) not… [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 8:16 am
The remaining 24% membership interests were sold to investors and denominated “Class B” and “Class C” interests, the Class B member having limited voting rights on mergers and acquisitions, the Class C members no voting rights, only an economic interest. [read post]
