Search for: "DOE Corporations 1-20" Results 1941 - 1960 of 5,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Littlefield.1 We address a single dispositive issue on review, namely, whether the trial court properly determined that the ten-year statute of repose contained in Indiana Code Section 34-20-3-1 does not apply to Akaiwa's cause of action. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am by PaulKostro
Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 317–19 and 335–45 (1995), Furst v Einstein Moomjy, Inc., 182 N.J. 1, 20–24 (2004). [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The closest case the majority shareholders were able to cite in their brief in support of dismissal was Matter of TDA Industs., Inc., 240 AD2d 262 [1 st Dept 1997], a case in which the court ruled that an agreement entirely “eliminating” stock voting rights disqualified the stock from being counted towards the 20% threshold to sue under BCL 1104-a. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:04 pm by Nate Nead
The EU (European Union) and volatility surrounding Greece, Italy and Spain where economies have failed to recover to pre-recession levels (Source: The Economist 1/09/16 China’s growth rate decline continues to concern investors (Source: WSJ 1/20/15). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Management, on the other hand, may not use corporate assets to buy votes in a hotly contested proxy contest about an extraordinary transaction that would significantly transform the corporation, unless it can be demonstrated … that management’s vote-buying activity does not have a deleterious effect on the corporate franchise. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 12:49 pm
Yet, violent and property crimes have decreased by 20 % since 1990 (BJS). [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:50 am by Jeff Gittins
Tim HawkesHouse Bill 84, which was recommended by the Executive Water Rights Task Force, clarifies that: (1) an approved nonuse application excuses the requirement of beneficial use from the nonuse application's filing date; (2) the filing or approval of a nonuse application, or a series of nonuse applications, does not constitute beneficial use or protect a water right that is already subject to forfeiture; and (3) a nonuse application does not bar a water right… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm by Richard Posner
  I am surprised that the Ryan plan does not propose the outright elimination of the corporate income tax, which might have dramatic effects on the repatriation of foreign earnings of American corporations. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
(Interestingly, the ACCC already has powers to pursue corporations for ‘unconscionable conduct’ under section 20, to which the media exemption does not apply.) [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
The repeal would raise $7 Billion over 10 years.Temporary Reduction in Recognition Period for S Corporation Built-In Gains Tax.According to IRC Section 1374, the highest marginal rate applicable to corporations (currently 35%) is imposed on the gain of an S Corporation that converted from a C Corporation, for gain that arose prior to the conversion. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:43 am by Vincent LoTempio
What does an inventor need to do to get a product to market? [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
"[20] Such a default rule assumes shareholders to be "rationally apathetic" and lacking incentive to actively participate in decision-making.[21] Bainbridge' reasoning does not take into account those shareholders, such as AFSCME's who desire to initiate change to the bylaws. [read post]