Search for: "DONALD v. THE STATE" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,998
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Peter S. Margulies
As demonstrated by recent waivers granted to individuals subject to President Donald J. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 12:29 am by Steve Lubet
Note: Yes, I know that two states do not require unanimous verdicts for conviction, and that SCOTUS has already heard argument in Ramos v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Rachel Bovard argues that “[i]f Google prevails” in Google v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
”  With the Senate sitting as a court of impeachment, taking this oath in his current state of mind could place him in a precariousposition. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
("Athena") filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:50 am by Amy Howe
The justices also denied review in Smyth v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court, which failed this year to decide a case that could have a major impact in eastern Oklahoma, has chosen a different path to determine whether tribal reservations in the state were officially terminated,” agreeing on Friday to review McGirt v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- On Friday, the United States filed its brief in response to the March 18, 2019 order of the Supreme Court inviting the Solicitor General to express the views of the United States on the petition for certiorari filed by Petitioners Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and Hikma Pharmaceuticals International Ltd. in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. [read post]