Search for: "Daniel v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
" Also, "A Brief Legislative History about Homebrewing in the United States": Part I and Part II.Constitutional Crisis Hotline, a podcast hosted by Jed Shugerman and Julie Suk (Fordham Law), has released an episode on "The 50th Anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:56 am
They involve many present day social/economic issues facing the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In the case of Celli v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:43 am
"Bland et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The two men also agreed to not sign any Sarbanes-Oxley certifications or file certain periodic reports with the Commission for a period of 12 months and to not violate the federal securities laws (SEC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Powell's Baffling Vote in Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Morton-Bentley, Seeing Isn't Believing: Ahlquist v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:30 am
Pfander and Daniel D. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
At The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog, Daniel Hemel contends that, even if the Court agrees with the challengers, “public-sector employers in sympathetic states still will be able to ensure that unions are reimbursed for their collective bargaining costs (including the cost of representing nonmembers). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:00 am
v=RxPZh4AnWyk [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:33 pm
That lawsuit, Patricia Fuller v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:00 am
[Def Noodles v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:20 pm
EDNY Judge Weinstein’s much publicized sentencing decision in the securities fraud case, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Cameron v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
